|
|
 The kanji for dolphin literally mean, sea pig. |

|
|
 Click to
enlarge.

 We
asked these guys what they thought and they said, "Humans should stop piddling
around and get serious." Hmm. We wondered what that could mean.





Whales are becoming fewer in number more
quickly than the dolphins except for the fresh water dolphins whose numbers
have deteriorated very rapidly. This is due to the thinning of the polar
stratospheric ozone. The disappearance of the whales which depend directly and
indirectly upon krill will become pronounced within about five years.
Carnivorous whales such as the famous cause celebre, Willy, do not have a
particularly bright future because of the accumulations of toxic chemicals in
the food chains. These bad circumstances will worsen as human numbers continue
to rise. Of course we wish humans would show some signs of slowing their
population increase or opting for a reduction in their numbers. They show no
signs of desiring to do so voluntarily. We are sorry to have to bring you the
bad news.
Think globally, act locally. Americans are, of
course are single largest cause of global habitat destruction. Curiously they
continue to try to find fault in the wrong places. They set the wrong examples,
use the platitudes to create complacency, and use red herrings to create
confusion. They continue to use NASA as a political football, rather than as a
tool to help stop habitat destruction. As they know full well, the gap between
what they could be and should be doing, and what they actually do continues to
widen. At best their efforts to stop habitat destruction and species
extinctions can be described as penny wise and pound foolish. That's a good
recipe for continued increasing rates of habitat destruction.

Japanese harvest 300 Minkes and eat them. That
would be bad if those were sacred cows. That would be bad if it were the real
cause of whale extinction. But, guess what jelly bean? That's not where the
fault lies.
 Polar stratospheric ozone holes.
|
|
"In fact the change in the air and in sunlight
in the next few decades may pose more danger to animals and plants than to
human beings. Laboratory tests show that UV-B can damage fish, shrimp, and crab
larvae, copepods, krill, and the zooplankton and phytoplankton at the
base of the food chains in the sea. A 10% increase in UV killed almost all
(phytoplankton) specimens. Since the Ozone Hole is going to be with us for at
least one hundred years, we could cause an evolutionary upheaval if thousands
of species in the sea weaken and others more resistant to these rays take over.
The billions of krill in Antarctic waters - which are shrimp-like crustaceans -
depend on the phytoplankton. Baleen whales, sperm whales, squid, seals, the
albatross and the penguin are among the many creatures that depend on the
krill. El-Sayed (researcher) suspects that krill may be among the first
casualties of the Ozone Hole. 'If anything happens to the krill,' he has said,
'the whole ecosystem will collapse. We can say good-bye to the whales, to the
seals, to the penguins, et cetera.'"
Jonathan Weiner, The Next One Hundred
Years, 1990. |
|
Dolphin Composite Population Graph, including
freshwater species.

 The President said, "No prob. It's just not scientific." And
that's all it took to quiet the ruckus.
 Click |
 |
This little graph shows the increase in human
numbers in the last few thousand years. In this case, the distance from 1,000
million to 7,600 million is 7.6 times the distance from zero to 1,000 million.
7.6 billion is demographers' mid projection. Graph curve is from Learning
Tools, KQED TV, San Francisco, a PBS educational tv station. Overpopulation
denialists right and left have asked about the source, so now you know. The
leader of the Task Force on Amphibian Decline living in Britain objected
calling the graph extreme and, "off the scale." But it isn't. It is simply
demographer's mid projection.
Usually when such a graph is drawn, a short
time scale is used. But an evolutionarily significant time scale can more
easily show relevant amounts of increase per unit of time.
The distance from 1,000 million to 7,600
million is 7.6 times the distance from zero to 1,000 million. The graph is an
accurate representation. |
|
Source: KQED, a PBS program available on
video tape to eligible schools and non-profit groups. 60 minutes. To Order:
Call Films for the Humanities, 1.800.257.5126 http://www.pbs.org/kqed/population_bomb/hope/teacher.html
|
|

naturalsciences.sdsu.edu/classes/lab2.7/lab2.7.html
|
|
 "Who gives a
hoot about habitat?"
|
|
For web searches on this subject:

|
|