Buddycom

Whatta Hero!
David Suzuki
Energy

Give your children a future this Christmas. Help Peter Nobel defrock the high priests of our present insanity!
"Take the Nobel name off the economics prize," say relatives.
by Jonathan Thompson Observer (London), 2 December, 2001
It is a name synonymous with peace. But with the centenary celebrations of the Nobel prizes beginning this week, a dispute has broken out between the custodians of Alfred Nobel's estate and members of his family.

Peter Nobel, the great-grandson of Alfred's brother Ludwig, along with three of his cousins, have questioned the legitimacy of the economics prize and demanded that the Nobel name be dropped from the award. They claim it was "never in Alfred Nobel's will and is not in the spirit of his prizes". Their stance has angered the Nobel Foundation, which administers the prizes, and threatens to overshadow the festivities.

The economics award has always been separate from the other five, which are given for outstanding contributions in the fields of literature, peace, physics, chemistry and medicine. Unlike these, economics was never mentioned specifically in Nobel's will; that prize was established in 1968 to celebrate the 300th anniversary of the Riksbank, the Swedish central bank. Peter Nobel and his cousins are now arguing that it should be named the Riksbank Prize to reflect its heritage.

They claim that Alfred Nobel, an idealist and inventor who has no direct descendants of his own, was highly sceptical of economics, and the existence of this award is an insult to his legacy.

The Nobel Foundation has sided with the Riksbank. "This is a non-issue," said Michael Sohlman, executive director of the foundation. "It is surprising because Peter Nobel is claiming that the family never agreed to this award, but I have very clear documentary evidence from 1968 showing that they did."

Mr Nobel said: "I am going to ask Mr Sohlman to produce these documents. I have never heard of their existence before and I would like to see the wording before I make any decision. The most important thing is to make a distinction between this economics award and the Nobel prizes."

http://magma.ca/~gpco/
http://www.scientists4pr.org/

"Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forever in a
finite world is either a madman or an economist."—Kenneth Boulding


REACHING FOR HEAVEN ON EARTH, by Robert H. Nelson
Nelson's book is a fantastic accomplishment, and stands now alongside Thurow's DANGEROUS CURRENTS as the best critique of economics that Jay has ever read.
See samples at dieoff.com/page235.htm or dieoff.com/page235.pdf
What possible role could a discipline as totally screwed-up as neoclassical economics, essentially nothing more than ancient Catholic religious dogma play in our society?
See: http://dieoff.com/page243.htm

It's obvious when one thinks about it... The role of the economist is simply to "prevent the American public from achieving a correct understanding of the actual workings of the American economic system." See Robert H. Nelson in http://dieoff.com/page235.htm :

"The members of the American economics profession, as Arnold contended, performed a vital practical role in maintaining this unique system of corporate socialism American style. It was their role to prevent the American public from achieving a correct understanding of the actual workings of the American economic system. Economists instead were assigned the task to dispense priestly blessings that would allow business to operate independent of damaging political manipulation. They accomplished this task by means of their message of 'laissez faire religion, based on a conception of a society composed of competing individuals.' However false as a description of the actual U.S. economy, this vision in the mind of the American public was in practice 'transferred automatically to industrial organizations with nation-wide power and dictatorial forms of government.' Even though the arguments of economists were misleading and largely fictional, the practical -- and beneficial -- result of their deception was to throw a 'mantle of protection ... over corporate government' from various forms of outside interference. Admittedly, as the economic 'symbolism got farther and farther from reality, it required more and more ceremony to keep it up.' But as long as this arrangement worked and there could be maintained 'the little pictures in the back of the head of the ordinary man,' the effect was salutary -- 'the great [corporate] organization was secure in its freedom and independence.' It was this very freedom and independence of business professionals to pursue the correct scientific answer -- the efficient answer -- on which the economic progress of the United States depended."

If you want to really understand why there is such a violent reaction to the news that people are nothing but animals, and there are limits to economic growth
If you have ever wondered why liberalism can't plan...
If you have ever wondered about the cozy relationship between government and big business...
If you have ever wondered why people are so committed to global economic development...
If you have ever wondered what the American Progressive Period was all about...
REACHING FOR HEAVEN ON EARTH, by Robert H. Nelson
amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0822630249/brainfood.a


CANADA'S GAS TANK IS RUNNING ON EMPTY!
A mailing list has been established especially for Canadians. Among other issues, a major topic is the the depetion of their natural gas resources. When the gas is gone (< 10 years), Canadians will have no way to heat their homes. How can they survive the freezing winters? Subscribe at
groups.yahoo.com/group/CanadaEnergy

ENERGY PRODUCTION, POPULATION GROWTH, AND THE ROAD TO THE OLDUVAI GORGEArchived, Richard Duncan's excellent GSA Summit 2000 Keynote paper, as published in Population and Environment, May-June 2001 at:
dieoff.com/page234.htm or dieoff.com/page234.pdf


Jay -- www.dieoff.org


Jay Hanson

Whatta Hero!

3monkeys
Mizaru, kikazaru, iwazaru.

Neko ni Koban, ne?


Buddycom