Buddycom
People

Environmentalism

Ultimately environmentalism without population reduction equals "wise use." Wise use is, of course, the term coined by the anti-environmentalists. Pretty amusing isn't it? Simple too. Let's write that mathematically.

(E - Pr) = Wu

Having analyzed the situation from a balanced perspective using reason instead of values, Buddycom tells the big picture truth about ecology which will please neither the right nor the left for different reasons. Having waited and watched humanity for several decades, the only thing we've seen changing thus far is the rate of destruction which continues to accelerate, and the degree to which humans feel good about perfunctory politically correct pollyanna or are simply in denial.

So, the only thing left to do is to just get used to it.

Practice this. Raise both shoulders a little and say, "Oh, well."

See there. Don't you feel just a little bit better already?


Level one.
In the next fifteen years people will discover that certain curves may go in interesting directions. Curves for various things may go up as well as down. Consideration of peripheral effect, species extinction, toxic waste and pollution, will yield to consideration of root cause, the numbers of Homo sapiens. The next fifteen years will make unavoidably obvious to all members of humankind that although they have cared tangentially and superficially for biodiversity and its benefits, they will care much more concretely about preserving their own lives. Biodiversity is the inevitable and permanent loser in this global turf battle. Who gives a hoot about habitat? People may question the exclusionary principle of "human ecology" and begin to consider the inverted V-curve as pertaining to that special species, Homo sapiens. As the goal posts get moved further and further towards anthropocentrism, individual inclinations to preserve biodiversity, having been laudable once upon a time, have become moot at best, ridiculous when anthropocentric cost benefit ratios are applied. Developed and developing nations will continue to change their topography replacing most of the remaining fragments of their natural ecosystems with patchwork quilt patterns of human development charcteristic of Europe. Canada will have come close to completing the cutting of the second fifty per cent of its forests which are home to three quarters of Canada's species of plants and animals. America will increase its loss of farmland to development from the present 3,000 acres per day. Forests will continue to burn. Coral reefs will continue to decay.

Levels two and three.
Grain stocks will continue to drop from the current all time low of just a 48 day supply to even more perilously low levels; prices, scarcity, and hunger will increase. Fish stocks upon which one sixth of humanity depends for its primary source of protein, will continue to decline to the point at which we will continue to try vainly to recreate the first trophic level while depleting the third and second of four trophic levels. Water supplies will continue to become perilously scarce to the point of exhaustion due to industrial use, desertification and salination. Average temperatures of the earth at various locations will continue to increase along with increases in the average concentration of carbon dioxide in the lower atmosphere to levels exceeding 400 ppm. The climate patterns will be changed with damaging effects to agriculture and life which will be irreversible in the short term. And the potential for massive global wars will increase dramatically. We do not like being thought of as alarmists. We will not find satisfaction in saying we told you so. Then again maybe satisfaction is where you find it. We wish people to wake up and make adjustments now, before any more ground is lost. This means bring the population down nowin both the rich and the poor countries, starting today. It would be an event of very low probability but, even if the world populace were accurately informed and came to accept a correct assesment of our collective situation, today, at this very moment and began to form new values and behaviors, the sheer inertia of our population will still propel the world population upwards towards a completely unstable and unsustainable ten billion. Africa, with half its population under 15 years of age will double its population in fifteen years; Haiti can not sustain its present population of seven million but, will double that to fourteen million in eighteen years. And then there's India, Pakistan, Indonesia, and China. And oil?

Level four.
Much depends upon how well a collapse is orchestrated and controlled. So far it seems to be going according to a relentlessly predictable pattern. We would use the word plan but, it has been pointed out by Vigdor Schreibman, of FINS, that usage of that word in this context would be in poor taste. Religious leaders and governmental institutions won't even lift a finger let alone acknowledge these scientific and demographic realities. As they define and interpret their belief systems at present, it would not be in their long term best interests. If there were a realization of apocolyptic prophesy, however, an industrialized, and clearly definable coalition stands to be the major if not the sole beneficiary. Depending on which side of the fence you find yourself as well as how high you stand on your socioeconomic totem pole, you may or may not want to think that one through. Acceptance of the status quo for persons who do think it through depends largely upon how chances of personally surviving a self fulfilled apocalyptic prophesy are viewed. Then again who knows, maybe the most important factor is IQ? Or age?

Quite the opposite of what may be expected or hoped for by some, there are forces knowingly and with full intention not only working against population reduction but, rather, resolutely dedicated to raising the consumptive and productive capacity of the large and unsustainable world population level. They are not only obstinately in denial of the concept of limits and its significance for resources and technology, they proactively obfuscate issues which would help others to appreciate its meaning. People are almost comical in their vehement denial of reality. Almost comical that is because they make life so unnecessarily difficult. Truth is thus very entertaining because it is indeed stranger than fiction. And it can be orders of magnitude more dangerous. But hey, nobody likes a Gloomy Gus, right? So, just raise your shoulders a little and repeat, "Oh,well."

There's pollyanna aplenty and one might wonder why serious efforts had to wait till the top of the ninth inning. It's now been three decades since the founding of the ZPG organization. At the very beginning of the twentyfirst century the human snowball has reached immense and absurdly unstoppable proportions.

Eco Buddy says, "Who really gives a hoot about habitat, anyway?"

Are current ecological considerations too little, too late? Or the first step is the beginning of a thousand mile journey? Well heck, you can decide for yourself.

Neko ni KoBan, ne?

With things going the way they are globally you need not bother yourself with level one or level two considerations of ecology. That's just a waste of time. And it's not as fascinating as the level three or four considerations. Here is our suggested reading list.


For those not interested in apocalyptical concepts these books will help you focus on the alternatives to fossil fuels which will be realized either instead of or after it does or doesn't happen.


Three books which explain various aspects of what the fuss is all about.

Apocalypse:
1. Revelation of Saint John the Divine
2. any of a class of Jewish or Christian writings that appeared from about 200 B.C. to A.D. 350 and were assumed to make revelations of the ultimate divine purpose.
3. revelation; discovery; disclosure

Apocalypticism:
1. any doctrine concerning the end of the temporal world, especially one that is based on the supposed prophetic passages in the Revelations of Saint John the Divine.
2. the millenial doctrine of the Second Advent and personal reign of Jesus Christ on earth.

Source: Random House Dictionary of the English Language


Ecology Buddycom