The current band of brothers assembled to represent a sort of Democrat
answer to the Cheney regime couldn't be more ridiculous. They add more proof to
their lack of electability each time they open their mouths. Why don't they just
say, "Hey, we were paid by the Carlyle group to lend credence to the supposition
that there will have been at least a modicum of resistance to the re-election of
Cheney's proxy. Democrats don't want the presidency." Could $Millions in numbered Swiss
accounts be what they're really after. That wouldn't be sporting, would it? There
needs to be some sort of decorus facade at the very least.
They are going to quibble about, as Robert Kutner puts it, "Bush's call to
broaden health care availability." Broaden availability. Broaden availability? Can you say Red Herring?

Kerry Slams Bush on Road to Iraq War January 25, 2004, AP
"Democratic presidential candidate John Kerry says President Bush has breached a
faith to keep young people from dying needlessly in combat, which he said was a
lesson from the Vietnam War. 'You truly should go to war as a matter of last
resort,' Kerry told CBS' '60 Minutes' in an interview to air Sunday night. 'I'm
afraid the president rushed to war without a plan to win the peace.'"
Story...
Can you say very creative semantics? Can you say Red Herrings?
 War. War. War. Clark was a general. Kerry was a decorated officer in Viet Nam. Do the Democrats know at least as much as the Republicans regarding war? Is president George W. Bush a coward? Both were rich. Both were Yale grads. Kerry killed gooks while Bush copped out. Is perpetual war inevitable if America wants to control oil and world hegemony? War. War. War. War. War. War. Like a broken record.

We didn't get past the first two paragraphs of this piece written by the right
honorable Senator John Kerry. We couldn't stop laughing.
America's Energy Future, by Senator John F. Kerry
"Americans spend more than $20 billion each year on oil from the Persian Gulf - often
from nations that are unstable and hostile to our interests and our values. I believe
that we must end this dangerous dependence because it leaves American security and the
American economy vulnerable to the vagaries of international oil markets and to those
who would use oil as an economic and political weapon. It is time to break with the
past and build an American energy future.
Reducing our dependence on oil and building a future of clean and abundant energy
are urgent national priorities. Our current political leadership, however, does
not treat them that way. Political support for research, development, and
deployment is based on the whims of George Bush and Dick Cheney's pals in the oil
business and so is funding bottled up by the Republican dominated Congressional
appropriations process. When President, I will assure that the nation is on track
to reduce oil dependence by creating an Energy Security and Conservation Trust
Fund capitalized by existing oil and gas royalty revenues and dedicated to
accelerating the commercialization of technologies that will reduce America's
dangerous dependence on oil."
January 26, 2004
solaraccess.com/news/story?storyid=5949
Experts: Outsourcing Helps World Economy
Story ...
Duh. Do you need experts to tell you that? You won't hear that outsourcing helps the world economy in the election
run-up. Why? Take a guess silly. Bush Allies, Falling Down on the Jobs
March 10, 2004, by Robert J. Samuelson, Washington Post "All this is a bad brew for Bush. Some of the steepest increases in joblessness have occurred in 'battleground states.' The unemployment rate is 6.7 percent in Illinois (up from a recent low of 4.1 percent), 7.6 percent in Michigan (up from 3.1 percent) and 6.2 percent in Ohio (up from 3.6 percent). The Democrats, the press and the offshoring furor are all fanning job insecurity. But the cruelest blow may be that many of Bush's supposed allies in large and small businesses are quietly helping the other guy." VeeJay says, "Does this mean that the Dems want the presidency?" We don't think so. If Bush isn't reappointed, he may face jail. The Carlyle Group seems far too powerful to allow that. Besides he did the dirty work which was required of him. And he has more dirty work yet to do. Dirty work which Kerry can not be relied upon to carry out satisfactorily.
A billion may be a difficult number to comprehend, but a viewer from Spokane,
Washington put that figure into perspective this way:
-A billion seconds ago, it was 1959.
-A billion minutes ago, Jesus was alive.
-A billion hours ago, our ancestors were living in the Stone Age.
-A billion dollars ago was only 8 hours and 20 minutes, at the rate Washington spends it.
Oil: The Illusion of Plenty
"One hundred and twelve billion of anything sounds like a limitless quantity. But in
terms of barrels of oil, it's just a drop in the gas tank. The world uses about 27
billion barrels of oil per year, meaning that 112 billion barrels--the proven oil
reserves of Iraq, the second largest proven oil reserves in the world--would last a
little more than four years at today's usage rates. In the future, 112 billion
barrels will likely prove even shorter-lived. In the United States, gas-guzzling
sport utility vehicles and larger homes are deemed essential. As the
underdeveloped world industrializes, demand for oil by billions of people
increases; China and India are building superhighways and automobile factories.
Energy demand is expected to rise by about 50 percent over the next 20 years,
with about 40 percent of that demand to be supplied by petroleum."
thebulletin.org/issues/2004/jf04/jf04cavallo.html For comparison, Saudi Arabia is said to have about 264 billion barrels of oil while Iraq is said to have about 200 billion barrels.
Give-Up-Itis. Give-Up-Itis. Kerry or Bush? Maybe it doesn't make a whole lot of difference. Maybe there is some difference. Three Democrats are
registered for every Republican. Yet the last presidential election was close enough
for the Republican Supreme Court to decide.
Why are so many Americans afflicted by Give-Up-Itis? Probably because the Bullshit is so deep there. Bent's suggested reading. "Recently the below mentioned books have been digested and even I had
grave suspicions about lots of what has happened in the past, I did
not realize how dangerous the globalization has become. For the last
40 years I have tried to educate my surroundings about overpopulation,
depletion, pollution, climate change etc.(with little success) but did not realize
the power of the oligarchs.
We have to eliminate the power of the members of the
BILDERBERGS, COUNCIL OF FOREIGN RELATIONS AND
TRILATERAL COMMISSION
If we don't, the fate of , not only mankind but the entire eco system, is doomed.
Maybe we are already there, but if Ihave to go down, I will go down fighting.
Here is a starter:
The following politicians are members of the
'COUNCIL OF FOREIGN RELATIONS' = World domination.
PAUL MARTIN,
JEAN CHRETIEN,
W.G.BUSH,
RICHARD B. CHENEY,
KISSINGER,
JOHN KERRY,
TONY BLAIR
and a hell of a lot more.
If some of the list members do not know what,
' COUNCIL OF FOREIGN RELATIONS,
stands for, I urge them to read the following books:"
groups.yahoo.com/group/energyresources/message/50176
The Prophecy -- 2024
"This book predicts the outcome of George W. Bush's second presidential run."
"what may be in store for our nation in the coming years.... Even though this book
was written well before September 11, 2001, a number of government actions since that
terrible tragedy are almost direct parallels to stories in this book."
Christian Patriots in Action
prophecy2024.com/
VeeJay says, "How does Bush spell compassion?" C O N T E M P T
Etymology: Middle English, from Latin contemptus, from contemnere
1 a : the act of despising : the state of mind of one who despises : DISDAIN
b : lack of respect or reverence for something
2 : the state of being despised

DER BUSH-MESSER Jede Woche analysiert SPIEGEL ONLINE die Chancen des US-Präsidenten für seine Wiederwahl.
spiegel.de/politik/ausland/0,1518,292538,00.html Kerry says the White House avoids talking about the issues by shooting the messenger. (Audio) Character Assasination Mode. Hysterical?
Kerry Calls on Rice to Testify
Mar 28, 4:01, by Nedra Pickler,
AP "On Clarke, Kerry said: 'Every time somebody comes up and says something that this White House doesn't like, they don't answer the questions about it or show you the truth about it. They go into character assassination mode.'
Besides Clarke, Kerry cited the examples of former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill and Medicare accountant Richard Foster.
'It is entirely inappropriate and almost hysterical of the White House to engage in this massive character assassination,' Kerry said later in an interview with Kansas City television station KMBC.
O'Neill was fired as Treasury secretary in December 2002 after publicly questioning the need for additional tax cuts, a core campaign issue for Bush. Foster said he was prohibited by his superiors from sharing with Congress a much higher but more accurate cost estimate for the administration's Medicare program." AP Story ... VeeJay says, "Will Rice Testify? March 25, 2004. Have you ever watched members of British Parliament calling each other right-honorable-this and right-honorable-that as they insult each other? It's fun to watch, isn't it? It's a real sideshow. It's televised so that people can see what's going on in government. But guess what, jelly bean? It has little or nothing to do with what goes on in government. It's just a sideshow. That's why it's ok to allow the television cameras in. Yes of course Rice will testify before the cameras. She knows just exactly what to say. One interesting thing will be to see how much egg she can throw on Kerry's face after he made such a big deal about the fact that Rice-Bush may be hiding something. Another point you may watch for is how many times she will use cliches about connecting dots or lapses in intelligence.
Big Problems? Or Handy Solutions? While striving for moral high ground Molly Ivins and Robert Bryce
demonstrate that they do not quite seem to get it. That's why they have to nibble
around the edges of big problems with a thin semblence of propriety. Fair and
equitable global distribution is not possible. America and the G8 are a minority
of humanity supported by a necessary hegemony. Take away hegemony and the G8
losses it's coveted lifestyle. In that light Bush's "ruinous policies" are well
calculated to maintain the status quo. Says Robert Bryce, "Bush has done nothing
to address America's long-term energy needs or deal with the greenhouse gas
problem." And yet, Bush's masterplan is right on track. Even if Kerry were to be
selected as the next President, the siege mentality which Bush has so diligently
nurtured is not unlikely to be continued. For Bush the energy elephant as well as
the population elephant are not the problems but, rather the solutions.
Vee Jay, 31; After the Tomahawks? Secular moralists which western democracies produce in
such abundance along with their NeoCon adversaries must deny that hegemony is the
sine qua non which keeps their hot air ballons afloat. They come up with blurbs
like this which work well if one is wearing blinders. What modifications would
they suggest, one may wonder.
 And then there's that other Red Herring: Lousy Intelligence? Lousy Intelligence Schmousy Intelligence. whatreallyhappened.com/houston52.htm
Bush's Greatest Failure 3/26/2004
by Robert Bryce, Texas Observer
"Democrats are attacking George W. Bush on many fronts: the lousy intelligence
that led to the Second Iraq War, his go-it-alone foreign policy, the faltering
economy, the paucity of new job creation, his penchant for deficit spending, his
questionable record while serving in the Texas Air National Guard, and even his
syntax and invention of words like "nucular." All of those things are being used
to bludgeon Bush.
But all of them pale when compared to the most important issue in America today:
energy. George W. Bush's greatest failure as the 43rd president of the United
States has been his lack of serious action on energy policy at a time when the
world desperately needs leadership from America. Global energy consumption is
soaring. Oil and gas production is faltering. Almost every month, new studies
come out that corroborate the harm being done to the world's atmosphere by carbon
dioxide, which comes from the burning of fossil fuels. And yet, Bush has done
nothing to address America's long-term energy needs or deal with the greenhouse
gas problem. mollyivins.com/showArticle.asp?ArticleID=1614  VeeJay says, "Is there an oil/energy crisis?" Who cares? Some say Bush is a bad guy because he's an oil man making trainloads of money for himself and for the Carlyle Group with US troops and high gas prices. Bush says burn it up as fast as possible. Keep the Armageddon Express on schedule. What does Kerry say? Burn it up faster, keep putting American's interests ahead of the interests of all other members of the human race, and keep gas prices low. Did Bush break a promise? Kerry says he did. John Kerry's Plan to Lower Gas Prices to Fuel Economy March 25, 2004 "A Kerry Administration
would act immediately to exert pressure on OPEC to abandon its cut in output
quotas and instead increase oil supplies." johnkerry.com/issues/energy/gas.html
VeeJay says, "Take Back the Media."
 takebackthemedia.com/true911.html |